- He undoes all of the climate change distortions in local media in less than140 characters. Holla @Twitter!
- It reminded me how important it is to keep light-hearted about these seriously not light-hearted issues. When I worked inside the beltway, I made sure to watch the Daily Show and Colbert Report as a lifeline.
|
Stephen Colbert tweeted about climate change in what is hands down my favorite tweet ever. After I stopped laughing/falling off my chair I thought about exactly why it is amazing:
1 Comment
Environmentalists threw down the gauntlet a few years ago on exactly ONE issue, and it was on the Keystone XL pipeline. The leader of 350.org, Bill McKibben, called it "gameover for the climate". Eco and civil rights protestors and hundreds of youth have been arrested outside the White House. It's been the single point of activism around climate change that galvanized eco peeps across the non-profit spectrum. Because the decision-making is concentrated in one guy: President Barack Obama. It's the Administration's ability to approve the pipeline since it will run over an international border with Canada. Or at least it was for many, many years until the House has passed the construction bill in trying to work around him.
Despite being pretty much not an activist (future post on that later), it got me fired up and ready to go. I wrote this letter to our President with my Hope bumper magnet (complete with dirt!) in a plea to not approve this disastrous pipeline. So what is it? And what's the big deal? Repeat after me: the Canadians couldn't get through a pipeline on their own soil to the West/Pacific route (aka why are WE taking the risk they wouldn't do themselves?), tar sands oil is more energy intensive and harmful to the planet requiring us to evaluate our societal direction (answer: it's time to wean ourselves off of oil, not just for the planet but for the power/politics/money that flow with it), the economics are not beneficial (it will create only temporary jobs and a handful permanently, as well as the major issue of externalities). This one is a doozy, so hold onto your butts enviroish friends! We desperately need to change the conversation on conservation. Climate change is somehow a very contentious political issue (n.b. in the U.S. only, a study across 39 nations found it ranked as the #1 global threat...but I digress). The environmentalist in me finds the whole thing bananas....it's akin to having a national debate over whether smoking causes cancer. The American Academy for the Advancement of Science has a campaign on the facts of climate change because our "national debate" is a bad sign for science at large. And that doesn't even account for the fact that the climate change denial machine is not just using the same tactics - but the exact same people - that spent time a few decades back trying to confuse people about whether cigarettes caused cancer. Like I said, bananas. It's easy to find despair. The poster child is a Republican Congressman from South Carolina who lost his 2010 primary battle because of backlash for his stance on climate change both existing and being man-made. He was on the House Subcommittee for Energy and Environment that got "Burn Noticed" for its lack of common sense on science basics. But Enviro(ish) is extremely anti-despair. I'm a believer in MLK Jr's quote that the arc of the moral universe is long, but bends towards justice. And the first step we take is acknowledging the truth. It's been a few years, so I checked up on that Congressman Bob Inglis, and checked in with an energy initiative in Washington D.C. led by four-star generals. Seeing conservatives not just having discussions but taking policy action regarding climate change gives me incredible amounts of hope. Here's the EcoPartyDownload on conservative solutions for climate change. Yes, you read that right.....conserve IS the root for both conservation AND conservative....is it not? (See what I did there?? Boom!) Photo courtesy of Securing America's Future Energy
We have our first topic requests coming in here @enviro(ish). I'm so excited and I just can't hide it! "Why are electric power (plug-in) vehicles better for the environment than gas powered cars?" So this is not only a fantastic topic and related to the big eco news for LA this past week, but it's also personally one of my most favorite things at the moment. 1) Because getting EV workplace charging for employees has been a 3-year labor of eco love that finally got some great results this past summer; and 2) I now am the proud owner of a Toyota RAV4 EV...it's all electric and a Tesla on the inside (woot!). The timing of #1 and #2 would be completely suspicious if it weren't for the fact I was in a horrible car accident (thank you spacey LA drivers, 2nd worst in the nation, stop looking at your phone!). I'm a huge believer that it happened for a reason...the LCA of my old car was too good to replace....but I digress. Short answer: it IS more eco-friendly to plug in than use the pump. Don't believe me at my word?? Ok, more answers below! Just commit this to the mems, and then learn "why" below the jump:
Electric vehicles add no local air pollutants (aka no tailpipe nasties that go to lungs/smog) and the grid burns much cleaner/has less greenhouse gas emissions than your gasoline or diesel for your car (aka efficiency of scale, more natural gas, and some renewables). The little internal combustion engine under your hood just can't eco-compete. Game, set, match! It's exciting times! Have you heard the news? An estimated 310,000 people marched through the heart of Manhattan on Sunday to raise awareness of the climate change crisis. It's the largest demonstration for climate change to date in history. Power to my peoples! Image: ABC 7 News
Exciting as it is though, we're (still) not focused on the message. Some of the participants were spot on, but the media coverage doesn't quite bring it home (only quotes from Sec. Kerry get it right in this entire NY Times article...he's in better, on-message company in the LA Times...look below the jump for Fox News). Here's the skinny. Climate change is not about the planet. Seriously. Forget the environmental bumper sticker that says "Save the Planet"...switch it in your head with one that reads "Save Ourselves". The planet will keep on turning. It's the environmental systems that WE all depend on for our well-being...those are on a rapid and accelerating pathway to horrorville. Repeat after me: caring about climate change means you care about people, especially yourself. I know what you're thinking, climate change? Personal? Isn't that something that affects polar bears and not me? Well the unfortunate answer to that is no. It's going to affect us all directly and indirectly. And it has already started. [Hold the dramatic musical score for a beat....]
Climate change is a big, hairy, scary issue. And there's a LOT of misinformation out there, which makes you think this is impossibly confusing. But don't stress! I'm going to make it bite-sized and easy. I love the Dinner Party Download concept, so we're running with that as inspiration. Welcome to the first installment of the Eco Party Download: "All you need to know to 'win' your eco party*...as told (mostly) with the help of your favorite celebrities." *having or going to an 'eco party' not required I've been talking about climate change for a decade, but the timing of this blog is impeccable. It means I get we get to hear Matt Damon talk about climate change. There's a fantastic documentary recently out that hits the right message on the nose. It's called Years of Living Dangerously, and uses celebrities as correspondents interviewing people's whose lives have been altered by climate change. Yes, there are many of these people, maybe even you! |
Enviro(ISH):(adj) balancing caring about the future of our planet with enjoying and living everyday life to the fullest Categories
All
Archives
October 2020
|
RSS Feed